Legal Opinion
Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. Gray
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 10, 1929No. 12186PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The defendant in error was the plaintiff and tbe plaintiff in error was the defendant in tbe trial court, and they will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.
The defendant published in the Daily Oklahoman, a daily newspaper owned and published by the defendant, a certain statement, as follows:
“Lawyer Arrested on Fraud Charge.
“Lee M. Gray, Counsel for Green, Faces Federal Trial.
“Lee M. Gray, Attorney, of Hennessey, was arrested Wednesday night by a deputy United States marshal on an indictment issued by the federal grand jury in session at Guthrie last week charging him…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Reporters' Ass'n of America v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Kee v. Armstrong, Byrd & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Kelly v. RoetzelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Woodruff v. . Bradstreet Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Hargrove v. Oklahoma Press Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fite v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Haynes v. Alverno Heights HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Edwards v. CraneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Holway v. World Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Carpenter v. RennerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.