Legal Opinion

Neish v. Doyle

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.

About February 15, 1929, the defendant was discharged in bankruptcy. The plaintiff held defendant’s notes given before the bankruptcy proceeding. In November, 1930, the plaintiff sued the defendant on said notes. The defendant did not appear or answer. His attorneys did write the plaintiff’s attorney calling attention to the bankruptcy proceedings and discharge. In February, 1931, the plaintiff entered judgment by default.

On the hearing of this motion the parties argued the necessity of pleading the defendant’s discharge as an affirmative defense. No attention was given to section 150 of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Birkett v. Columbia BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Columbia Bank v. . BirkettNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Walker v. . MuirNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Rukeyser v. TostevinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. Wheeler v. NewtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co. v. PearlNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. BreskinNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Public Finance Corp. v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Lancaster Loan Co. v. Weien, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API