Legal Opinion

Lincoln Rochester Trust Co. v. Pearl

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarrollton A. Roberts, J.

This is a trial without jury to determine whether a creditor whose debt admittedly was not scheduled in a bankruptcy petition is nonetheless discharged by reason of alleged actual knowledge of the petition.

Paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of section 17 of the National Bankruptcy Act (U. S. Code, tit. 11, § 35, subd. [a], par. [3]) excepts from the operation of the discharge all provable debts which “have not been duly scheduled in time for proof and allowance, with the name of the creditor if known to the bankrupt, unless such creditor had notice or actual knowledge of the *632proceedings in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hill v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Kreitlein v. FergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Morrison v. VaughanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. Keefauver v. HevenorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  5. Wheeler v. NewtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Porter v. Arrow Investment Corp. (In Re Porter)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981
  2. Willows Convalescent Centers, Inc. v. DurheimCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API