Legal Opinion
Hillstrand v. State
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided February 19, 1960No. Civ. Nos. A-16205, A-16247PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MeCARREY, District Judge.
These two cases have been consolidated for the purpose of a jurisdictional determination on a question of law common to both. The State of Alaska has filed a motion for summary judgment, wherein they request the Court to dismiss the claims for relief filed by the plaintiffs for the reason that 48 U.S.C.A. § 321d gives the State the right to enter upon the property in question for the purpose of changing present existing roadways and making improvements thereon, without the necessity of paying compensation to the landowners.
The facts in this case are that Plaintiff…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Ide v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Youngstown Steel Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Capital Electric Power Ass'n v. HinsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
- Green v. WilhiteIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- A. J. Myers v. The United States. Walter James Weaver v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- City of Phoenix v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Bittle v. Cam-Colorado, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Myers v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1962
- Application of RobinsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1966