Hawley v. Brownell, Atty. Gen. Of United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit to compel the Alien Property Custodian to return to the plaintiff, who is our appellant, certain interests in property vested by the Custodian. The action is brought, according to the complaint, under Sections 9(a) and 32(a) of the Trading with the Enemy Act. 1 The District Court granted summary judgment for the defendant and dismissed the complaint.
It seems plain that the complaint, viewed as a suit pursuant to Section 9, was barred by the statute of limitations. Section 33 of the Act provides that no such suit may be instituted after April 30, 1949,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clark v. Uebersee Finanz-Korp., AGSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- General Motors Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Guessefeldt v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- McGrath v. ZanderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Pflueger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dr. Endre Ungar v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Helmut Legerlotz v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Bantel v. BrownellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Bantel v. BrownellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956