Legal Opinion

Bantel v. Brownell

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 7, 1956No. 13146PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit arising under the Trading With the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1 et seq. (1952). The complaint seeks return of vested property under Section 9(a) of that Act, or in the alternative a mandatory injunction and *693declaratory judgment.1 The District Court dismissed the complaint, and this appeal followed.

Plaintiffs-appellants are and always have been citizens and residents of Germany, and hence as former enemies are prima facie barred from relief under Section 9(a) by the express language of that section. They argue, however, that General License No.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hawley v. Brownell, Atty. Gen. Of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bantel v. BrownellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  2. Von Clemm v. BanuelosDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API