Legal Opinion

Sheets v. Huben

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1958No. Docket 74, Calendar 46,864PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The question in this case is whether a certain instrument in the form of a deed of conveyance was intended as a deed or as a mortgage. The circumstances leading to the execution of the instrument are these: Mrs. Dorothy Sheets, the plaintiff, was purchasing certain property on land contract, subject to a mortgage. She had previously invested at least $1,500 in the property. She had made a down payment of $1,300, had made monthly payments, upon principal, totalling $478, and, in addition, had made substantial improvements. Financial difficulties, however, had come upon her because of an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rehn v. BoothMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Alber v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Porritt v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Simington v. GoldsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kawauchi v. TabataHawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Koenig v. Van RekenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Ellis v. Wayne Real Estate Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Bryce v. JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Grant v. Van RekenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API