Legal Opinion

Frye v. Secrest Pipe Coating Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 23, 1958No. 38317PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

On the 27th day of July, 1957, John M. and Dora Hickman, claimants, filed the first notice of injury and claim for compensation seeking an award under the Death Benefit Provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 85 0.S.1951 § 1 et seq., for dependency benefits due to the death of Ernest Hickman, hereinafter called employee. Lucille Frye, administratrix of the estate of Ernest G. Hickman, was thereafter substituted as claimant. The State Industrial Commission denied an award, and this proceeding is brought by claimant against Secrest Pipe Coating Company, employer, and its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McFarland v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Souder v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Gatterdam v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Karlen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Burba v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Greer v. Sinclair Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. White v. Kitty Clover CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Welch v. Schuler Fruit CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API