Frye v. Secrest Pipe Coating Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
On the 27th day of July, 1957, John M. and Dora Hickman, claimants, filed the first notice of injury and claim for compensation seeking an award under the Death Benefit Provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 85 0.S.1951 § 1 et seq., for dependency benefits due to the death of Ernest Hickman, hereinafter called employee. Lucille Frye, administratrix of the estate of Ernest G. Hickman, was thereafter substituted as claimant. The State Industrial Commission denied an award, and this proceeding is brought by claimant against Secrest Pipe Coating Company, employer, and its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McFarland v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Souder v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Gatterdam v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Karlen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Burba v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Greer v. Sinclair Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- White v. Kitty Clover CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Welch v. Schuler Fruit CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960