Legal Opinion

Holmberg v. Hannaford

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 9, 1939No. 442PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEVIN, District Judge.

On November 12, 1937, plaintiffs filed their bill of complaint herein. On April 20, 1938, an amended bill of complaint was filed, and, on December 2, 1938, there was filed an “Amendment to Amended Bill of Complaint”.

In the amendment just referred to plaintiffs recite that, in addition to the parties named in paragraph X in the amended bill of complaint, the following persons were, on the second day of May, 1932, each the owner of a certain number of shares of the capital stock of the Southern Minnesota Joint Stock Land Bank of Minneapolis, to-wit: George W. Weimer, C. J.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Bank v. St. Louis Dispatch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Hughes v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  3. Wheeler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Christopher v. BrusselbackSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Baker v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perrott v. United States Banking CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1944
  2. Miller v. HoffmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
  3. United States v. EarlingDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1941
  4. ter Haar v. Seaboard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API