Legal Opinion
David Vakili v. MTD Products Inc. and Tractor Supply Company
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 10, 2025No. 1:23-cv-00104Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAVID VAKILI, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-104 : Plaintiff : (Judge Neary) : v. : : MTD PRODUCTS INC. and : TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY, : : Defendants : MEMORANDUM Juries play a crucial role in the American legal system by resolving factual disputes. But judges can and do decide whether factual disputes exist. To be able to present his case to a jury, a party must show there is at least some admissible evidence to prove their case. Here, plaintiff David Vakili alleges a snow thrower was defective because its design lacked a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.