Legal Opinion

Clifford v. Ruocco

California Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1952No. L. A. 22178Published

1Opinion of the Court

39 Cal.2d 327 (1952)

MARY R. CLIFFORD, Appellant,

v.

R. T. RUOCCO, Respondent.

L. A. No. 22178.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

July 16, 1952.

Edgar B. Hervey and Henry F. Walker for Appellant.

McInnis & Hamilton and John W. McInnis for Respondent.

GIBSON, C.J.

Plaintiff was given judgment upon a jury verdict in an action for personal injuries arising out of an automobile collision. She takes this appeal, contending that the award of damages is inadequate and that the judgment is therefore unsupported by the evidence.

Plaintiff rented living accommodations from defendant, and she testified that…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Cox v. Tyrone Power Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Pearl v. PearlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API