Legal Opinion

Brotman v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 24, 1995No. Docket No. 29294-91PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Pursuant to a purported qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) entered in the Court of Common Pleas for Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, P received a cash payment from a profit-sharing plan, in which her ex-husband participated. P subsequently filed a complaint in the U.S.

Read the full summary

Pursuant to a purported qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) entered in the Court of Common Pleas for Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, P received a cash payment from a profit-sharing plan, in which her ex-husband participated. P subsequently filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, against her ex-husband and the plan administrator, raising the issue of whether the purported QDRO met the statutory requirements of a QDRO under sec. 206(d)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), Pub. L. 93-406, 88 Stat. 829, 29 U.S.C.…

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Tannenwald, Judge:

Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s 1988 Federal income tax of $11,752 and an addition to tax of $588 under section 6653(a)(1).1 This case is before us on respondent’s motion for partial summary judgment under Rule 121 that collateral estoppel precludes petitioner’s claim that a domestic relations order entered January 7, 1988, by the Court of Common Pleas for Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, is not a “qualified domestic relations order” within the meaning of section 414(p).

The disposition of a motion for summary judgment under Rule 121(b) is controlled…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  5. Commissioner v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carter v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Estate of Bartels v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1996
  3. Estate of Armstrong v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
  4. Gardner v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2015
  5. Fitzpatrick v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API