Legal Opinion

Sauer v. Sauer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1921No. 11,055PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Lake Superior Court; Virgil S. Reiter, Judge. Action by Albert Sauer, for whom Wilhelmina Sauer, administratrix of the estate of Albert Sauer, deceased, was substituted, against Constance G. Sauer and another. From the judgment rendered, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBatman, J.

The record discloses that appellant’s decedent commenced this action against appellees to re*24cover judgment on a promissory note, and to foreclose a mortgage alleged to have been given to secure the same. Appellee Frederick W. Sauer was defaulted. Issues were joined by his coappellee Constance G. Sauer, and a trial had by the court. At the conclusion of the evidence the judge trying the cause stated in open court that he “found for the plaintiff against the defendant, Frederick W. Sauer, and in favor of the defendant, Constance G. Sauer, on the grounds of surety-ship,” and requested the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Philip Carey Co. v. VickersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Grubb v. MilanIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Vesey v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Walker v. HellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Harp v. Vanderburgh Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Ex Parte Alabama Marble Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. In Re PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API