Saylor v. Arcotta
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Parraguirre, C.J.:
In this appeal, we clarify the applicable limitations periods for equitable indemnity and contribution claims. In doing so, we conclude that claims for equitable indemnity are subject to the limitations period prescribed by NRS 11.190(2)(c), while claims for contribution are subject to the limitations period prescribed by NRS 17.285. Because no judgment has been entered in the case at hand, and thus the applicable statutes of limitations have not yet begun to run, we reverse the district court’s summary judgment as to appellants’ third-party complaint for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Company v. Latrobe Die Castingcompany, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- State v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- The Doctors Co. v. VincentNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Rodriguez v. Primadonna Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pack v. LATOURETTENevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Contreras v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2015
- Reddy v. PMA InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Southern California Edison v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Bank of N.Y. v. S. Highlands Cmty. Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.