Legal Opinion

McCosker v. Fredericksen

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1957No. Civ. No. 8971PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

This appeal arises out of an action originally instituted by James M. McCosker, Sr., and his wife against the defendants Fredericksen wherein specific performance was sought of a contract to sell certain real property in Lake County. The Fredericksens cross-complained and sought to quiet their title to the property. Additionally the Frederick-sens instituted a second proceeding against Stanley McCosker as administrator of the estate of James M. McCosker, Sr., and his wife by which the Fredericksens sought to eject and oust the McCoskers from the property. The McCoskers cross-complained and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baker v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Drullinger v. ErskineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. McCosker v. McCoskerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Foley v. CowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Bonney v. PettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taliaferro v. HaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Fredericksen v. McCoskerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API