In Re Will of Brown
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The case turns on the twelfth assignment of error. The three daughters of the deceased, parties interested in tbe event, testified that their father did not have sufficient mental capacity to make a will when tbe paper-writings propounded as such were executed. They then related a number of personal transactions and communications bad with the deceased, upon which they based their opinions.
Was tbe testimony relating to these transactions and communications competent as substantive evidence?
It has been held that, in a proceeding of this kind, both propounders and caveators are “parties” within…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Clary's Administrators v. ClarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
- In Re HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- McLeary v. . NormentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- In Re Will of ChismanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. MayhandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Moore v. New York Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.