Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 26, 2020No. 8:19-cv-00300Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (SOUTHERN DIVISION) ) HAROLD SULLIVAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No.: 8:19-cv-00300-GLS ) WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA ) TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before this Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority (“WMATA”). (ECF No. 30). Plaintiff Harold Sullivan (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition, and WMATA has filed its reply. (ECF Nos. 31, 32). The matter has been fully briefed. Upon review of the pleadings and the record, the Court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  5. Fowler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API