Legal Opinion
De Luca v. United Nations Organization
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 10, 1994No. 92 Civ. 2021 (WK)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff moves for default judgment against the United Nations and eight U.N. officials and employees under Federal Rule of Civfl Procedure 55(b)(2). On March 80, 1998, plaintiff filed a complaint pro se alleging breach of contract, forgery, negligence and the violation of federal civil rights and employee medical benefits law. When plaintiff served process upon defendants during April, May and June 1993, the U.N. Legal Counsel wrote the court explaining that the organization and the individual defendants— with respect to acts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dombrowski v. EastlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mark Labounty v. Stephen G. Adler, E. Carrillo, Walter A. Burdge, J. Grigioni, and All Program Committee MembersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Ronald Tuck v. Pan American Health OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. BahelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Klayman v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Brzak v. United NationsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Lempert v. RiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Swarna v. Al-AwadiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.