Legal Opinion
Brzak v. United Nations
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 29, 2008No. 06 Civ. 3432PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The United Nations (“U.N.”) has moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) to dismiss the complaint of Cynthia Brzak (“Brzak”) and Nasr Ishak (“Ishak”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) and to intervene pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 24. For the reasons set forth below, the United Nation’s motion to dismiss is granted.
Prior Proceedings
On October 28, 2005, Brzak filed a Title VII claim against the U.N., Kofi Annan (“Annan”), Wendy Chamberlin (“Chamber-lin”), Ruud Lubbers (“Lubbers”), and five other individual defendants (collectively, “Individual Defendants”) with the Equal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mendaro v. World BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Marvin R. Broadbent v. Organization of American StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Tachiona v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Leutwyler v. Office of Her Majesty Queen Rania Al-AbdullahDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- De Luca v. United Nations OrganizationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brzak v. United NationsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Devi v. SilvaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Polak v. INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUNDDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Swarna v. Al-AwadiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Zuza v. Office of the High RepresentaitveDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.