Legal Opinion

Howell v. Howell's Admr.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 16, 1920PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Hickman Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hurt

Affirming.

This was an action by the administrator of the estate of R. C. Howell, deceased, against the heirs and creditors for a settlement of the estate. The estate con- • sisted of a very small amount of personal property and a small farm of the value of from six to seven hundred dollars. The decedent’s only heirs were two sons, the *557appellant, Samuel Howell, and appellee, E. L. Howell, and a granddaughter, the appellant, Myrtle Arrington, who was the child of a daughter of decedent who had died before her father. The only creditor who presented a claim…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. SnowdenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
  2. Gross v. CourtleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Kelly v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Hall v. OrmeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Price v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maddox v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  2. Briscoe v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API