Legal Opinion

Cornell v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1921No. Civ. No. 2315Published

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The action was for damages caused by the failure of defendant to promptly deliver a telegram, and plaintiff had judgment for the sum of $534, from which the appeal is taken. The telegram was left at the office of L. N. Cornell, a brother of plaintiff, who was away at the time, and was not delivered to plaintiff until several days thereafter. The telegram was sent by one W. H. Coffinberry from South San Francisco, and related to a loan of $5,000 from the South San Francisco Cattle Loan Co., for which plaintiff had made application to enable him to purchase some cattle.

As to the damage suffered…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Leonard v. New York, Albany & Buffalo Electro Magnetic Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Union Constr. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Manville v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. DuboisIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. True v. International Telegraph Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API