Carroll v. Wallace

The nature of the rule and proceeding now before us upon “the merits, is explained in the opinion of this Court, in this •case, rendered on motion to dismiss. 1 McGloin, 9.

The answers of the garnishee, are fair, full and explicit, but ;the merits having been investigated, I consider- it shown ithat the garnishee has property subject to the plaintiff’s writ. «Objection is, however, made to condemning the garnishee, at ■this stage of the proceeding, and Caldwell v. Townsend, 5 Martin, La. N. S. 308; Proseus v. Mason, 12 La. An. 16; Lynch v. Burk, 10 Rob. La. 138; Collins & Leake v. Friend, 21…