Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Wallace

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 1881No. 91PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Third District Court. Monroe, J.

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Dismiss.

McGloin, J.

Plaintiff instituted his suit by attachment against defendant, and made G. W. Sentell garnishee, propounding the usual interrogatories. These were answered, and plaintiff moved to have them taken pro confessis, declaring that lie was entitled to such a judgment upon the face of the answers. The parties seem to have drifted, upon the trial, into a general contest involving the truth of the statements set up in said answers. There was judgment dismissing the rule, and plaintiff has appealed.

As the rule was presented, it did not, as to plaintiff, involve the whole…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Covington Pontiac-Buick-GMC Trucks, Inc. v. AAA Sewer & Water Fabrication & Service, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. August v. SorsbyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1884
  3. Carroll v. WallaceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API