Legal Opinion

Hills v. Kernion

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1844PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the First District, Buchanan, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSimon, J.

The plaintiffs seek to recover the sum of §4756 40, which they allege, has been illegally claimed and received from them by the defendants, who were inspectors of tobacco, over and above the fees fixed by law, during the period mentioned in the account annexed to their petition, beginning on the 4th of April, 1840, and ending 13th of May, 1842. They state that, being in the habit of receiving large quantities of tobacco, the same was inspected by the defendants; that the fees fixed by law for the inspection, sampling, &c., are sixty cents per hogshead, but that the inspectors have illegally…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mowatt v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  2. Ripley v. GelstonNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  3. Clinton v. StrongNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  4. Perrillat v. PuechSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1831
  5. Cantzler v. GordonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cabinet Makers Union v. SommersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1884
  2. Carroll v. WallaceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1881
  3. Correos v. Western Progressive - Nevada - Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API