Legal Opinion

Hood v. Hood

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 5, 1958No. 132PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KANNER, Chief Judge.

Appellant petitioned the chancellor to declare appellee’s creation of Suncoast Medical Clinic, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the clinic, and the contracts entered into by appellee with the clinic to be fraudulent insofar as she was concerned, or if not fraudulent to be in violation of her alimony rights under the contract theretofore entered into between the appellant and appellee, in consequence of which he should pay her alimony as though the clinic had never existed. In the alternative, if the contracts were found to be valid, then because of the changed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Virginia Metal Products Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Simpson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Buckmaster v. KelleySupreme Court of Florida · 1875
  4. Parker v. PriestleySupreme Court of Florida · 1949

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. MDS (Canada), Inc. v. Rad Source Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
  2. Colbath v. ColbathDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  3. Marshall v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Spector v. AlterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. Markham v. MarkhamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API