Legal Opinion
Parker v. Priestley
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided March 4, 1949PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Action by Myrtle Priestley against I.T. Parker, as administrator with will annexed of the estate of Charles J. Priestley, deceased, for goods bargained and sold and for rent. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded with directions. This appeal is taken from a judgment for the plaintiff in the court below rendered by the Circuit Court in and for Broward County.
Mrs. Myrtle Priestley filed her declaration against the defendant, I.T. Parker, as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Charles J. Priestley, deceased, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hazen v. Cobb-Vaughan Motor Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928
- McClure v. Century Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Adams v. Board of Trustees of Internal Improvement FundSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
- Robinson v. Dibble's AdministratorSupreme Court of Florida · 1880
- Lewis v. MeginnissSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Proprietors Ins. Co. v. ValsecchiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Angrand v. KeySupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Broward National Bank v. BearDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Allstate Insurance Company v. DoodyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Seeba v. BowdenSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.