Simpson v. Simpson
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
63 So.2d 764 (1953)
SIMPSON
v.
SIMPSON.
Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.
March 17, 1953.
Carey & Harrison, St. Petersburg, for appellant.
Bussey & Simmons, St. Petersburg, for appellee.
ROBERTS, Chief Justice.
The principal question here presented may be stated as follows: Where the husband petitions for a reduction of the amounts allowed in a former decree for alimony and child support, is the wife entitled to suit money, including a reasonable attorney's fee, under the provisions of Section 65.16, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.? It is our opinion that Section 65.16 should be so interpreted. This is so…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chiapetta v. JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- McNeill v. McNeillSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Vinson v. VinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Frohock v. FrohockSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Selinsky v. SelinskySupreme Court of Florida · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kittel v. KittelSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Coggan v. CogganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Fowler v. FowlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Haynes v. HaynesSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Gullette v. OchoaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.