Legal Opinion
State v. Copeland
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 19, 1996No. 62417-8Published
1Opinion of the Court
922 P.2d 1304 (1996)
130 Wash.2d 244
The STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
William COPELAND, Appellant.
No. 62417-8.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued November 16, 1995.
Decided September 19, 1996.
Nielsen & Acosta, Eric J. Nielsen, Seattle, for appellant.
Norm Maleng, King County Prosecutor, James Whisman, Cynthia Gannett, Regina Cahan, Deputies, Seattle, for respondent.
MADSEN, Justice.
A jury found Defendant William Copeland guilty of first degree premeditated murder and of first degree felony murder predicated on rape in the first or second degree. He raises a number of issues, including…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Talmadge; Concurrence · Durham.
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.