Legal Opinion

McAllister v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1931No. Docket No. 6735PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

A general and special demurrer of the respondents to the complaint having been sustained, the plaintiff declined to amend, whereupon judgment was entered accordingly.

The portions of the complaint material to plaintiff’s appeal consist of the following: “The defendant, Kathryn Lloyd, so negligently, carelessly and unlawfully operated and drove an automobile . . . that the automobile which defendant, Barbara Brown, was driving, through the concurrent negligent acts of the said defendants, Kathryn Lloyd and Barbara Brown, .ran into and against the automobile of this plaintiff. . . . That the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Smith v. ButtnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Jacobson v. Oakland Meat & Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Manwell v. Durst Bros.California Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Rannard v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API