Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Miller

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 6, 2008No. Docket 04-6665-prPublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge:

The Supreme Court has vacated our decision in this habeas proceeding with the instruction to reconsider it in light of Car ey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. 70, 127 S.Ct. 649, 166 L.Ed.2d 482 (2006).

Relying on our own well-settled precedent and what we conceived to be the teachings of the high court, we had held that the New York State Courts had unreasonably applied “clearly established” Sixth Amendment law in excluding Jose Rodriguez's family from his criminal trial. Accordingly, we remanded the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Jackson v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  2. State v. NdinaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Gibbons v. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  4. Friedman v. RehalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. Jones v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API