Legal Opinion

MacKay v. Hardy

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1995No. 940058PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:

J. Earl Jones brought this cross-claim against Roy E. Hardy and Rex L. Jackson for an accounting and wind-up of a dissolved partnership pursuant to sections 48-1-34 and 48-1-40 of the Utah Code. The district court awarded Jones $76,673.23 for his interest in the partnership. Hardy and Jackson now contend that the district court erred in (i) concluding that the partnership held an equitable interest in forty-two lots subject to a lease held by Bloomington Knolls Association, (ii) valuing the partnership’s interest in each of the forty-two lots at $3,500, and (iii)…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Savage Industries, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Matter of Estate of BartellUtah Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Jeffs v. StubbsUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cheves v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Orton v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Biddle v. Washington Terrace CityUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Christensen & Jensen, P.C. v. Barrett & DainesUtah Supreme Court · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API