Gainey v. Sieloff

This case comes before us on remand from the Supreme Court for the purpose of addressing the merits of certain evidentiary rulings made by the trial court. 428 Mich 896 (1987). In our prior decision in this case, we essentially concluded that the majority of issues now under consideration were not reviewable due to their abandonment or to defendants’ failure to make an offer of proof. 154 Mich App 694, 700-702; 398 NW2d 498 (1986). In view of the conclusions stated in the Supreme Court’s order of remand regarding the evidentiary matters now before us, we reverse our prior decision.

The…