Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Henry

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Baker: Gustav Anderson, Judge. Suit to foreclose mining liens by F. W. Bishop against Susie Norwood Henry, Steve Chaplin, Grace Carmalt, A. W. Eastham, George W. Paris, George Hansell, Joe Kingsbury and E. C. Crawford, for materials, supplies and labor upon a certain mill and •mining claims. The court below decreed a lien upon the mill and the real property but refused any lien as to the mining claims. Plaintiff and defendant, Kings-bury, appeal. Modified. In Banc.

Read the full summary

From Baker: Gustav Anderson, Judge. Suit to foreclose mining liens by F. W. Bishop against Susie Norwood Henry, Steve Chaplin, Grace Carmalt, A. W. Eastham, George W. Paris, George Hansell, Joe Kingsbury and E. C. Crawford, for materials, supplies and labor upon a certain mill and •mining claims. The court below decreed a lien upon the mill and the real property but refused any lien as to the mining claims. Plaintiff and defendant, Kings-bury, appeal. Modified. In Banc. Statement by Mr. Justice Bean. This is a suit to foreclose certain quartz mining liens on what is commonly known as the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

Crawford resists the liens sought to be foreclosed in this suit begun November 26, 1913. He consented to the removal.of the mill which has been sold for $500, and a portion of the proceeds are in the hands of the county clerk. The.question involved herein relates to the mining claims. The several liens were filed to secure payment for materials and supplies furnished and labor performed in the development of the mines. The lien notices were similar. In that of Hans C. Olson it is stated in part thus:

“That the said mining claims are known as the Nor-wood group of mining claims and are situated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gordon v. DealOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hamilton v. Delhi Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  3. McPhee v. LitchfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Arata v. Tellerium Gold & Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Loud v. Gold Ray Realty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stuart v. Camp Carson Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. O. O., Inc. v. Cape Mountain Rock Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API