Abraham v. Moler
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Per curiam
Appellants seek the overthrow of a $100,000 judgment against them claiming it is excessive. They present also five additional questions. They contend the appellee (Mrs. Moler) failed to produce any affirmative evidence negating contributory negligence; they claim “the verdict is contrary to the evidence;” a verdict in their favor should have been directed, they say, at the close of the evidence; they question the admissibility of the testimony of a medical witness.; they say it was error to exclude the testimony of another of their witnesses. We incline to the belief, however, that the appeal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. BarrackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Honolulu Ltd. v. CainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Raff v. Acme Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Ensor v. OrtmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Hall, Admx. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Schear v. Motel Management Corp. of AmericaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Menish v. Polinger CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Mondawmin Corporation v. KresCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Kirkpatrick v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Hooper v. MouginCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.