Legal Opinion

Abraham v. Moler

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 10, 1969No. [No. 166, September Term, 1968.]PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants seek the overthrow of a $100,000 judgment against them claiming it is excessive. They present also five additional questions. They contend the appellee (Mrs. Moler) failed to produce any affirmative evidence negating contributory negligence; they claim “the verdict is contrary to the evidence;” a verdict in their favor should have been directed, they say, at the close of the evidence; they question the admissibility of the testimony of a medical witness.; they say it was error to exclude the testimony of another of their witnesses. We incline to the belief, however, that the appeal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. BarrackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Honolulu Ltd. v. CainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. Raff v. Acme Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Ensor v. OrtmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  5. Hall, Admx. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Schear v. Motel Management Corp. of AmericaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Menish v. Polinger CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Mondawmin Corporation v. KresCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Kirkpatrick v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Hooper v. MouginCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API