Farwell v. San Jacinto & Pleasant Valley Irrigation District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, J., pro tem.
The plaintiff is the owner and holder of certain bonds issued by the defendant corporation. She instituted this action September 7, 1917, to recover about $83,000, principal and interest owing to her on said bonds. The defendant and intervening land owners of the district made two principal defenses to the cause of action of plaintiff, namely, that the cause was barred by the limitation of subdivision 1, section 337, of the Code of Civil Procedure, and that by a judgment of the superior court in and for the county of Riverside given, made, and entered on June 17, 1899, in a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cal. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co. v. Sierra Valleys Ry.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Board of County Commissioners v. Clarke & CourtsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- Rialto Irr. Dist. v. StowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- Ham v. Grapeland Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Irvine v. BossenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People Ex Rel. Webb v. Honey Lake Valley Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Board of Education of Duncan v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Tingwall v. King Hill Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
- In re Imperial Irr. DistDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.