Davis v. Whitney
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The referee has found that the use made by the defendants of their premises was reasonable. According to the decisions in this state, the defendants are entitled to judgment. Bassett v. Salisbury Co., 43 N. H. 569; Hayes v. Waldron, 44 N. H. 580; Swett v. Cutts, 50 N. H. 439; Eaton v. Railroad, 51 N. H. 504, 533; Brown v. Collins, 53 N. H. 442; Haley v. Colcord, 59 N. H. 7; Green v. Gilbert, 60 N. H. 144; Rindge v. Sargent, 64 N. H. 294.
Judgment for the defendants.
All concurred.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rindge v. SargentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886
- Haley v. ColcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
- Green v. GilbertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1880
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mesiti v. Microdot, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1990
- Moore v. Berlin Mills Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907