Legal Opinion

Billingslea Grain Co. v. Howell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 13, 1918No. 1246PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Collingsworth County; J. A. Nabers, Judge. Action by the Billingslea Grain Company against John Howell and others. From judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Appellant Grain Company, a private corporation organized under the laws of Oklahoma, through W. S. Wisdom, as its agent, was engaged in buying grain and cotton seed at Dodsonville, Tex., during the summer and fall of 1916, for shipment. About the 10th of October of that year Wisdom was forced to leave and appellee, John Howell, accepted the agency for appellant Grain Company at Dodsonville, and represented said company in the purchase of cotton seed and grain until about November 2d, when he, according to his statement, ceased to buy for appellant Grain Company and entered into an agreement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States Express Co. v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Thomas Manufacturing Co. v. KnappSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schultz v. HinshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  2. John A. Dickson Pub. Co. v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. King Copper Co. v. DreherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  4. Wolforth v. A. J. Deer Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. John A. Dickson Pub. Co. v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API