Legal Opinion
Ankuda v. R.N. Fish & Son, Inc.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided February 26, 2008No. 07-95-P-HPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTION IN LIMINE
DAVID M. COHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant R.N. Fish & Son, Inc. filed a motion in limine to exclude testimony of plaintiff Mary Ellen Ankuda’s designated expert witnesses, Daniel Briggs, David A. Halsey, M.D., and various health-care providers. See Defendant’s Motion in Limine To Exclude Expert Testimony, etc. (“Motion”) (Docket No. 7) at 1. Based on the plaintiffs counsel’s representations in his client’s opposing brief, the defendant withdrew its motion with respect to Ankuda’s health-care providers, including Dr. Halsey. See Defendant’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Ruiz-Troche v. Pepsi Cola of Puerto Rico Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Teresa Ambrosini v. Jorge Labarraque and the Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. JamesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010
- US BANK NAT. ASS'N v. JamesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010
- FWK Holdings LLC v. Shire PLC (Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Complaint)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- Picone v. Shire U.S. Inc. (Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Class Action)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020