Legal Opinion

Thorlton v. Guirl Drainage Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1916No. 23,018PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Clay Circuit Court; John M. Rawley, Judge. Action by Wallace Thorlton against the GuM Drainage Company and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDairy, J.

Appellant brought this suit to enjoin appellees from proceeding under the act of the legislature, approved, March 10, 1913 (Acts 1913 p. 433, §8233b Burns 1914), to construct certain drain and levee improvements in Clay County. The separate demurrers of appellees to the complaint were sustained and this ruling of the court presents the only error relied on for reversal. Prior to the commencement of this suit a complaint was filed by one Bemis to enjoin further proceeding in reference to the same improvement contemplated in this case. A demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint in that case having…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harriman v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. State ex rel. Duensing v. RobyIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. School Town of Andrews v. HeineyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Bemis v. Guirl Drainage Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Trustees of Plymouth Church v. BueterIndiana Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dortch v. LugarIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Bowman, AuditorIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Zoercher v. AglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API