Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State, Ex Rel. v. Bowman, Auditor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1927No. 25,353Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion.

Martin, J.

I concur in the result reached by the court for the reason hereinafter given.

The exact provisions of the Constitution and statutes which present the question here considered, are as follows:

Constitution, Art. 4, §29, §132 Burns 1926: “The members of the General Assembly shall receive for their services a compensation to be fixed by law; but no increase of compensation shall take effect during the session at which such increase may be made. . . .”

Acts 1881 p. 517, §1, §7561 Burns 1914:

“Sec. 1. .. . . the pay of the members of the General Assembly shall be $6.00 per…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Fairbank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Nicol v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. HENDERSON BRIDGE COMPANY v. Henderson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API