State, Ex Rel. v. Bowman, Auditor
Indiana Supreme Court
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion.
Martin, J.
I concur in the result reached by the court for the reason hereinafter given.
The exact provisions of the Constitution and statutes which present the question here considered, are as follows:
Constitution, Art. 4, §29, §132 Burns 1926: “The members of the General Assembly shall receive for their services a compensation to be fixed by law; but no increase of compensation shall take effect during the session at which such increase may be made. . . .”
Acts 1881 p. 517, §1, §7561 Burns 1914:
“Sec. 1. .. . . the pay of the members of the General Assembly shall be $6.00 per…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Fairbank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Nicol v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- HENDERSON BRIDGE COMPANY v. Henderson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.