Dobry v. Western Manufacturing Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Howard county. Tried below before Harrison, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Ryan, C.
The questions presented in this case arise upon a motion to discharge an attachment and upon an order directing a sale of the attached property which was entered contemporaneously with the entry of final judgment.
It was held in Horkey v. Kendall, 53 Neb. 522, that a notary public who is the attorney of one of the parties to an action is not permitted to take the affidavit of his client for the purpose of procuring an attachment; but it was also.held that an affidavit of the nature and taken as just indicated was not a mere nullity. Under these conditions it was proper to permit the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co. v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- A. C. Rudolf & Co. v. R. L. McDonald & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- Horkey v. KendallNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Struthers v. McDowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- Clarke Banking Co. v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ramsay Motor Co. v. WilsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
- Barker Co. v. Central West Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Elmen v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Shoaff v. GageDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1958