A. C. Rudolf & Co. v. R. L. McDonald & Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court for Seward county. The opinion states the case. cited Hcurrison v. King, 9 Ohio State, 388. Ward v. Howard, 12 Id., 158. Lane v. Morse, 6 How. Pr., 394. Vincent v. People, 5 Parker, 88. Goolc, v.. Staats, 18 Barb., 407. Patterson v. Gulmcure, 2 Disn., 505.
1Opinion of the Court
Lake, Ch. J.
The plaintiffs in error complain of the order of the court below in adjusting the priorities of liens acquired by several attachment creditors upon the property of Frederick Bick, their common debtor.
Two of these attachments, one by Hundley, Judd & Co., and that of McDonald & Co., were sued out and levied upon the property in question, simultaneously on the twenty-ninth of October, 1875. So that, as between these* neither acquired priority. On the day following Hundley, Judd & Co. sued out a second order of attachment, and this was immediately levied, subject to the two already…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stage v. OldsOhio Supreme Court · 1843
- Stewart v. CarterNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
- Struthers v. McDowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by14 opinions
- Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co. v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Connelly v. EdgertonNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
- National Bank v. PetersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Deere, Wells & Co. v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Fromholz v. McGaheyNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.