VALLEY ADVOCATES v. City of Fresno
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAWSON, J.
This appeal concerns an application to demolish a building located in downtown Fresno and expand a parking lot onto the cleared land. The building is one of two nearly identical 90-year-old apartment buildings located next to one another. After receiving the site plans, the City of Fresno (City) (1) decided not to list either building in the local register of historic resources, (2) rejected an argument that the buildings were historic resources for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), 1 (3) determined the proposed project was exempt from CEQA, and (4)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Consolidated Irrigation District v. City of SelmaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- California Unions for Reliable Energy v. Mojave Desert Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Bottini v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Citizens for Restoration of L Street v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.