Legal Opinion

LAIF X SPRL v. Axtel, S.A. de C.V.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 23, 2004No. 04-1509-CVPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Circuit Judge.

Under the bylaws of Axtel S.A. de C.V. (“Axtel”), a Mexican corporation, disputes between and among the company and its shareholders are subject to arbitration. Disputes have arisen between LAIF X SPRL (“LAIF X”) and Telinor Telefonía (“Telinor”). LAIF X contends that Telinor violated the Axtel bylaws by entering into a subscription agreement that illegally diluted LAIF X’s ownership interest in Ax-tel. Although the parties are currently arbitrating this dispute, LAIF X claims Telinor has in effect “refused” to arbitrate by filing a lawsuit in Monterrey, Mexico, that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Painewebber Incorporated Sheldon Chaiken Lee H. Lovejoy Anthony Presogna Kevin Collins v. Henry J. Faragalli, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Regina Jacobs v. USA Track & Field and United States Anti-Doping AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. William Cary Downing v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Anthony L. Arciniaga v. General Motors Corporation, Docket No. 05-6299-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. American International Specialty Lines Insurance v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
  3. Laif Sprl v. AxtelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. Armbrister v. Pushpin Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API