Legal Opinion

Anthony L. Arciniaga v. General Motors Corporation, Docket No. 05-6299-Cv

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 8, 2006No. 231PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

This case arises from a dispute between Anthony L. Arciniaga and General Motors Corporation (“GM”). The merits of that dispute, however, are not today’s concern. Instead, our task is to determine if the Motor Vehicle Franchise Contract Arbitration Fairness Act of 2002 (the “MVFCAFA”) limits GM’s ability to enforce its arbitration agreement with Arci-niaga. The district court found that it does. We find that it does not. Thus, we reverse the district court’s denial of GM’s motion to compel arbitration and its grant of Areiniaga’s motion to stay arbitration.

BACKGROUND

Th…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Ragone v. Atlantic Video at the Manhattan CenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Ross v. American Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. Spinelli v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. In Re American Express Merchants'litigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. Nayal v. HIP Network Services IPA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API