Legal Opinion
Moll v. Moll
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 21, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert J. Lunn, J.
Defendant in this divorce action is a highly successful and well-compensated account executive and financial advisor with Morgan Stanley Dean Witter. This court is presented with a unique question raised by defendant in the context of a motion for partial summary judgment. As stated in defendant’s order to show cause, he seeks an order determining as a matter of law that “the clients serviced by the defendant at Morgan Stanley Dean Witter do not constitute ‘his book of business’, which is a marital asset subject to valuation and distribution.” Ac*771cordingly,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Price v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re the Accounting of BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Dugan v. DuganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- May v. MayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- Marriage of Finby CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Marriage of Heidemann CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
- May v. MayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003