Legal Opinion

Marriage of Finby CA4/3

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 2013No. G046814UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, J.

Mark Finby (husband) appeals from a judgment on reserved issues, covering child custody and support, spousal support, and division of the parties’ assets. He contends the trial court erred in its characterization, valuation, and division of Rhonda Finby’s (wife) bonuses conditionally received or earned from her employer before the parties separated. We find his arguments have merit.and reverse the judgment.

FACTS

The parties married in 1995 and separated in February 2010. During the marriage, wife worked as a financial advisor. Before January 2009, she worked for UBS…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re Marriage of SkadenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. In Re Marriage of FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. In Re Marriage of LehmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marriage of Childs CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Marriage of D'Souza CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Marriage of Klingler CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Marriage of Lakdawala CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API