Legal Opinion

Post v. Tamm

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1916No. 12922PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Brawley, J., entered March 23, 1915, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff by direction of the court, in an action on a promissory note.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought upon a promissory note. The issues were framed by the complaint and seventh amended answer and the reply thereto. The complaint prayed for judgment upon the note. The answer prayed for a rescission. By order of the court, the cause was tried to a jury acting in an advisory capacity. At the conclusion of the defendant’s evidence, the plaintiff moved for a directed verdict. This motion was sustained, and a verdict was returned under the direction of the court. From the judgment entered, the defendant appeals.

*505The note was for the sum of $4,000, and was executed and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Fishburne v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Crilly v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Tassel v. McGrailWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Blaine v. DarwinWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. First Methodist Episcopal Church v. SodenWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Rhodes v. OwensWashington Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API