Chelsea Garland et al. v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHELSEA GARLAND et al., Case No. 25-cv-03437-BAS-SBC 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ 13 v. MOTION FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND TO STAY ACTION 14 MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC, (ECF No. 20) et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is a motion for interlocutory appeal and to stay action 18 submitted by Defendants Mead Johnson & Co., LLC; Mead Johnson Nutrition Co.; and 19 Reckitt Benckiser LLC (“Motion”). (ECF No. 20.) For the reasons below, the Court 20 DENIES Defendants’ Motion. (Id.) 21…