Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Taylor

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 1987No. A030984PublishedCited by 7 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHANNELL, J.

—Wife appeals from a postjudgment order determining her interest in Husband’s judicial retirement benefits and denying her requests for modification of spousal support and for attorneys’ fees.

In her appeal, Wife has challenged the validity of the “terminable interest rule,” as it has been applied under the Judges’ Retirement Act. We are satisfied that the trial court’s order, when entered, was correct and in accord with then-existing law. After this case was fully briefed, however, the Legislature added section 4800.8 to the Civil Code, 1 effective January 1, 1987, with the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Miller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re Marriage of GillmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Swink v. FingadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re Marriage of PowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Allard v. FrechTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re Marriage of ColvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. In Re the Marriage of NiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API